Skip to content

Conversation

marcoieni
Copy link
Member

@marcoieni marcoieni commented May 24, 2025

Move this PR job to AWS codebuild to use AWS credits for CI.

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 24, 2025
@marcoieni marcoieni force-pushed the x86_64-gnu-tools-codebuild branch from 38c69c3 to ec5e841 Compare May 24, 2025 13:39
@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

r? @Kobzol

@marcoieni marcoieni marked this pull request as ready for review May 24, 2025 17:29
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 24, 2025
@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

@rustbot ready

@Kobzol
Copy link
Member

Kobzol commented May 25, 2025

@bors r+

We should maybe also post something to Zulip to explain people to mostly ignore the AWS entries in the PR CI job list.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 25, 2025

📌 Commit ec5e841 has been approved by Kobzol

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 25, 2025
@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

marcoieni commented May 25, 2025

ignore the AWS entries in the PR CI job list.

What do you mean? 🤔

@Kobzol
Copy link
Member

Kobzol commented May 25, 2025

image

This will now start appearing on every PR, I'm sure some people will be curious what it is :) Especially since clicking on it takes you to a page where people won't have access.

@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

Oh, that's unfortunate, right

jhpratt added a commit to jhpratt/rust that referenced this pull request May 25, 2025
…ld, r=Kobzol

ci: move PR job x86_64-gnu-tools to codebuild
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 26, 2025
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #134696 (Implement `normalize_lexically`)
 - #138744 (Add methods to TCP and UDP sockets to modify hop limit (refresh of #94678))
 - #140539 (Simplify `attribute_groups`)
 - #140863 ([rustdoc] Unify type aliases rendering with other ADT)
 - #140936 (Clarify WTF-8 safety docs)
 - #140952 (Specify that split_ascii_whitespace uses the same definition as is_ascii_whitespace)
 - #141472 (Attempt to improve the `std::fs::create_dir_all` docs related to atomicity)
 - #141502 (ci: move PR job x86_64-gnu-tools to codebuild)
 - #141559 (const-check: stop recommending the use of rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 26, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #134696 (Implement `normalize_lexically`)
 - #140539 (Simplify `attribute_groups`)
 - #140863 ([rustdoc] Unify type aliases rendering with other ADT)
 - #140936 (Clarify WTF-8 safety docs)
 - #140952 (Specify that split_ascii_whitespace uses the same definition as is_ascii_whitespace)
 - #141472 (Attempt to improve the `std::fs::create_dir_all` docs related to atomicity)
 - #141502 (ci: move PR job x86_64-gnu-tools to codebuild)
 - #141559 (const-check: stop recommending the use of rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 905b46a into rust-lang:master May 26, 2025
9 of 13 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request May 26, 2025
Rollup merge of #141502 - marcoieni:x86_64-gnu-tools-codebuild, r=Kobzol

ci: move PR job x86_64-gnu-tools to codebuild
@ehuss ehuss added this to the 1.89.0 milestone May 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants